On Monday 25 June 2012 06:00 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: >> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxx> >> > Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti@xxxxxx> > how will this ever work with DT ? What you say makes sense however that is what currently most of the omap drivers do. Will check on this. > I say we get rid of the OMAP-specific > API and build this "context lost" status directly on dev_pm_info and > have something like pm_runtime_lost_context() or something with pm QoS > tell you if a device has lost its context. > > Also, your commit log doesn't really state any problems you might have > reached before, or any improvements wrt latency coming out of suspend > and so on. > > IMHO, drivers need a generic way to differentiate if they're resuming > from OFF or RET, otherwise we will end up with a bunch of OMAP-specific > hackery on all drivers -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
