Stephen,
On Wednesday 20 June 2012 09:57 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 06/20/2012 10:26 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 06/20/2012 06:56 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
Use clk_disable_unprepare() inplace of clk_disable().
This was missed as part of moving clock enable/disable to
prepare/unprepare for using the common clock framework.
...
I see no reason not to take the second patch in the series through the
I2C tree though.
Uggh. Ignore that paragraph - the other patch was sent separately not as
a series.
so are you taking care of this patch or do I need to send the patch
based on your tree in place of linux-next?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
