On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 02:50:23PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti Datta wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Wolfram Sang <w.sang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 08:00:28PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti D wrote: > >> From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> > >> > >> stat & BIT(1) is the same as BIT(1), > > > > Not true. I'd guess you are missing some context in the patch > > description. > > > See the explanation , hope I understood your concern correctly. > > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg70277.html The code may be right, but as Russell pointed out, the patch description is very weak. I could read the mail now to understand, but I prefer to wait for a better patch description. Because I need to ensure other people reading the git history later will understand easily without having to search the web. Regards, Wolfram -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
