On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 14/06/12 09:17, Alessandro Rubini wrote: >>> >>> You change only one half of ux500 here: the part where the device >>> gets defined statically, but not not the definition in the >>> device-tree. >> >> Yes, I'm aware. That's why I added Lee Jones as Cc:, on Linusw's >> suggestion. Lee told me to go ahead and he'll fix the DT stuff. > > I did? Yes :-) > I have already DT:ed this driver. There are 3 patches on the MLs currently. > >> [PATCH 1/3] i2c: Add Device Tree support to the Nomadik I2C driver >> [PATCH 2/3] ARM: ux500: Add i2c configurations to the Device Tree for >> DB8500 based devices >> [PATCH 3/3] Documentation: Device Tree binding information for i2c-nomadik >> driver > > I'm more than happy for you to base your patches on these and make the > necessary changes. Off hand, I think the only changes you'll need to make is > the probing from DT itself. Depends on whether this patch or yours go in first I guess. Which is up to Wolfram. What I know is that Alessandros patches are ready to merge IMO. > So something like: > > - compatible = "stericsson,db8500-i2c", "st,nomadik-i2c"; > + compatible = "st,nomadik-i2c", "arm,primecell"; Yep that should do it. Which brings me to the fear of what happens the day we have deployed device trees out there and just cannot change things like this easily :-/ Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
