On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 11:10:47AM +0530, Shubhrajyoti Datta wrote: > On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 4:29 AM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxx> wrote: > > Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti@xxxxxx> writes: > > > >> The patch series does the following > >> > >> - Warn fixes if CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME is not selected. > >> - In case of i2c remove register access was done without any > >> get_sync fix the same. > >> - Folds a patch from Tasslehoff to prevent any merge conflicts. > >> - Prevents the XDUF flag to be set if the underflow condition is not met. > >> - As per discussion in [1] .Adds a patch to rename the 1p153 errata and > >> use the unique id instead as the section number in the recent errata > >> docs has changed. > >> > >> v9: > >> Fix the comments from Wolfram Sang > >> > >> v10: > >> Add a patch from Neil to the series. > >> Fix kevin comments > >> update the patches with comments. > > > > Shubhrajyoti, thanks for the updates. > > > > Wolfgang, with these updates and testing a bit better described, I'm OK > > with you merging it. Merging it now will give it plenty of time to > > bake in linux-next and get more test exposure. > > Agree, > These are only fixes can it be considered for rc3? "Baking in linux-next" and "considering rc3" don't match; baking needs time, rc3 is soon. I've put the patches now into my -next branch for more exposure. I am still uncertain if they should be in 3.5 already; there seem to be worhty fixes in there, but they do depend on stuff which don't really qualify as bugfixes... Thanks, Wolfram -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
