>-----Original Message----- >From: Shubhrajyoti Datta [mailto:omaplinuxkernel@xxxxxxxxx] >Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 6:10 PM >To: Zhang, Sonic >Cc: Ben Dooks; Wolfram Sang; linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; LKML; uclinux-dist- >devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] i2c: i2c-bfin-twi: Move blackfin TWI register access >Macro to head file. > >Hi , >On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Zhang, Sonic <Sonic.Zhang@xxxxxxxxxx> >wrote: >> >> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: Shubhrajyoti Datta [mailto:omaplinuxkernel@xxxxxxxxx] >>>Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 5:48 PM >>>To: Zhang, Sonic >>>Cc: Ben Dooks; Wolfram Sang; linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; LKML; uclinux-dist- >>>devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] i2c: i2c-bfin-twi: Move blackfin TWI register access >>>Macro to head file. >>> >>>Hi , >>>Some minor comments/ doubts. >>>On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:50 PM, <sonic.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> From: Sonic Zhang <sonic.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>> >>>A small description may be helpful. >>>Also the $SUBJECT says move the patch looks more like the remove. >>>Am I missing something. >> >> The subject says these definitions are moved to a head file by the other patch >for Blackfin architecture. > >Got it thanks. > >You may want to add a dependency otherwise it might lead to a compilation break? > That patch for Blackfin architecture has already been merged into mainline. Regards, Sonic > >> >> Regards, >> >> Sonic -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
