On Thursday 10 May 2012 05:24 PM, Jean Delvare wrote:
Hi Laxman,
On Thu, 10 May 2012 16:54:53 +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
Jean,
On Tuesday 24 April 2012 12:49 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
Adding support for protocol mangling I2C_M_NOSTART.
When multiple message transfer request made through i2c
and if any message is flagged with I2C_M_NOSTART then
it will not send the start/repeat start/address of that
message i.e. send the data directly.
Now the framework/core changes for making M_NOSTART as a separate flag
is already part of your tree.
So do I need to re-send the patch for having that change?
1/1 is already part of Wolfram's tree and so not sure that how do I go
i.e. from where I take the base i2c-tegra driver.
It may create the problem in integration on main if they are not sync.
Also I have some couple of changes which will be on top of this.
I'm not sure I read you correctly so, for clarity: the patch
introducing I2C_FUNC_NOSTART finally landed in my tree [1], not
Wolfram's. It will be merged in kernel 3.5.
[1] http://khali.linux-fr.org/devel/linux-3/jdelvare-i2c/
If you don't want to depend on that, then just use
I2C_FUNC_PROTOCOL_MANGLING for now and you can switch to
I2C_FUNC_NOSTART later.
It is fine. So this change can go in to Wolfram's tree as it is and
after k3.5, I will post another change which will use I2C_FUNC_NOSTART.
Thanks,
Laxman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
