On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 02:50:02PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote: > Shouldn't we add the pinctrl states in dts file at the same time > with this patch series or using another separate patch to add them > before this series to avoid breaking the exist mx6q platforms? > Ah, I just noticed that your patch "ARM: imx: enable pinctrl dummy states" did not cover imx6q. I think we should do the same for imx6q, so that we can separate dts update from the driver change. When all imx6q boards' dts files get updated to have pins defined for the devices, we can then remove dummy state for imx6q. Doing so will ease the pinctrl migration for those imx6q boards. Will update your patch on my branch to have dummy state enabled for imx6q. > > net: fec: adopt pinctrl support > > can: flexcan: adopt pinctrl support > This two also depends on another patch you sent. > [PATCH RESEND 1/9] ARM: mxs: enable pinctrl dummy states > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg173341.html > > Maybe you can put this two in the mxs convert series to avoid breaking > mxs platforms. > [PATCH 0/9] Enable pinctrl support for mach-mxs > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg173312.html > Right. I'm going to merge these two series into one since there are device drives shared between imx and mxs. -- Regards, Shawn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
