On 04/05/12 21:25, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 04 May 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
ab8500-i2c is used as core code to register the ab8500 device.
After allocating ab8500 memory, it immediately calls into
ab8500-core where the real initialisation takes place. This
patch moves all core registration and memory allocation into
the true ab8500-core file and removes ab8500-i2c completely.
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones<lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
These changes all look good, but I think I would go further here.
I believe we discussed this and I agreed that we could leave that
for later, but upon reading this code, I think now that it's getting
rather silly.
@@ -125,6 +126,41 @@ static const char ab8500_version_str[][7] = {
[AB8500_VERSION_AB8540] = "AB8540",
};
+static int ab8500_i2c_write(struct ab8500 *ab8500, u16 addr, u8 data)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = prcmu_abb_write((u8)(addr>> 8), (u8)(addr& 0xFF),&data, 1);
+ if (ret< 0)
+ dev_err(ab8500->dev, "prcmu i2c error %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int ab8500_i2c_write_masked(struct ab8500 *ab8500, u16 addr, u8 mask,
+ u8 data)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = prcmu_abb_write_masked((u8)(addr>> 8), (u8)(addr& 0xFF),&data,
+&mask, 1);
+ if (ret< 0)
+ dev_err(ab8500->dev, "prcmu i2c error %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int ab8500_i2c_read(struct ab8500 *ab8500, u16 addr)
+{
+ int ret;
+ u8 data;
+
+ ret = prcmu_abb_read((u8)(addr>> 8), (u8)(addr& 0xFF),&data, 1);
+ if (ret< 0) {
+ dev_err(ab8500->dev, "prcmu i2c error %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+ return (int)data;
+}
+
static int ab8500_get_chip_id(struct device *dev)
{
struct ab8500 *ab8500;
Each of these functions is called only from a single location, and through an indirect
function pointer.
+ ab8500->read = ab8500_i2c_read;
+ ab8500->write = ab8500_i2c_write;
+ ab8500->write_masked = ab8500_i2c_write_masked;
Which you unconditionally assign here.
If you apply this patch below, then there is no reason to add any of those.
There is room for additional simplification even, but this is the most
important one. Note that the ab8500 mutex was only needed to support the
case where write_masked is not present, and that the debug output
on error is pointless because the prcmu driver already writes the same
output. The next step would be to remove all the {get,set}_register functions
from ab8500 and just call the prcmu directly.
It's something I'm happy to do, but wasn't the point of the patch. I
don't know much about this code, as I didn't write it.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann<arnd@xxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/mfd/ab8500-core.c | 72 +++---------------------------------------------------------------------
include/linux/mfd/abx500/ab8500.h | 1 -
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/ab8500-core.c b/drivers/mfd/ab8500-core.c
index 1f08704..b10bd2f 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/ab8500-core.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/ab8500-core.c
@@ -138,24 +138,8 @@ static int ab8500_get_chip_id(struct device *dev)
static int set_register_interruptible(struct ab8500 *ab8500, u8 bank,
u8 reg, u8 data)
{
- int ret;
- /*
- * Put the u8 bank and u8 register together into a an u16.
- * The bank on higher 8 bits and register in lower 8 bits.
- * */
- u16 addr = ((u16)bank)<< 8 | reg;
-
dev_vdbg(ab8500->dev, "wr: addr %#x<= %#x\n", addr, data);
-
- mutex_lock(&ab8500->lock);
-
- ret = ab8500->write(ab8500, addr, data);
- if (ret< 0)
- dev_err(ab8500->dev, "failed to write reg %#x: %d\n",
- addr, ret);
- mutex_unlock(&ab8500->lock);
-
- return ret;
+ return prcmu_abb_write(bank, reg,&data, 1);
}
static int ab8500_set_register(struct device *dev, u8 bank,
@@ -169,21 +153,7 @@ static int ab8500_set_register(struct device *dev, u8 bank,
static int get_register_interruptible(struct ab8500 *ab8500, u8 bank,
u8 reg, u8 *value)
{
- int ret;
- /* put the u8 bank and u8 reg together into a an u16.
- * bank on higher 8 bits and reg in lower */
- u16 addr = ((u16)bank)<< 8 | reg;
-
- mutex_lock(&ab8500->lock);
-
- ret = ab8500->read(ab8500, addr);
- if (ret< 0)
- dev_err(ab8500->dev, "failed to read reg %#x: %d\n",
- addr, ret);
- else
- *value = ret;
-
- mutex_unlock(&ab8500->lock);
+ ret = prcmu_abb_read(bank, addr, value, 1);
dev_vdbg(ab8500->dev, "rd: addr %#x => data %#x\n", addr, ret);
return ret;
@@ -200,42 +170,7 @@ static int ab8500_get_register(struct device *dev, u8 bank,
static int mask_and_set_register_interruptible(struct ab8500 *ab8500, u8 bank,
u8 reg, u8 bitmask, u8 bitvalues)
{
- int ret;
- /* put the u8 bank and u8 reg together into a an u16.
- * bank on higher 8 bits and reg in lower */
- u16 addr = ((u16)bank)<< 8 | reg;
-
- mutex_lock(&ab8500->lock);
-
- if (ab8500->write_masked == NULL) {
- u8 data;
-
- ret = ab8500->read(ab8500, addr);
- if (ret< 0) {
- dev_err(ab8500->dev, "failed to read reg %#x: %d\n",
- addr, ret);
- goto out;
- }
-
- data = (u8)ret;
- data = (~bitmask& data) | (bitmask& bitvalues);
-
- ret = ab8500->write(ab8500, addr, data);
- if (ret< 0)
- dev_err(ab8500->dev, "failed to write reg %#x: %d\n",
- addr, ret);
-
- dev_vdbg(ab8500->dev, "mask: addr %#x => data %#x\n", addr,
- data);
- goto out;
- }
- ret = ab8500->write_masked(ab8500, addr, bitmask, bitvalues);
- if (ret< 0)
- dev_err(ab8500->dev, "failed to modify reg %#x: %d\n", addr,
- ret);
-out:
- mutex_unlock(&ab8500->lock);
- return ret;
+ return prcmu_abb_write_masked(bank, reg,&bitmask,&bitvalues, 1);
}
static int ab8500_mask_and_set_register(struct device *dev,
@@ -1013,7 +948,6 @@ int __devinit ab8500_init(struct ab8500 *ab8500, enum ab8500_version version)
if (plat)
ab8500->irq_base = plat->irq_base;
- mutex_init(&ab8500->lock);
mutex_init(&ab8500->irq_lock);
if (version != AB8500_VERSION_UNDEFINED)
diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/abx500/ab8500.h b/include/linux/mfd/abx500/ab8500.h
index fccc300..5f70328 100644
--- a/include/linux/mfd/abx500/ab8500.h
+++ b/include/linux/mfd/abx500/ab8500.h
@@ -232,7 +232,6 @@ enum ab8500_version {
*/
struct ab8500 {
struct device *dev;
- struct mutex lock;
struct mutex irq_lock;
int irq_base;
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
M: +44 77 88 633 515
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
