On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 04:02:56PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > Dear Shawn Guo, > > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:01:08PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > > > > It complains that data might be undefined, do you want it in a > > > > > > separate patch then ? > > > > > > > > > > Yes, but only if you can prove that the compiler is right. > > > > > > > > It's not right, because that variable is always initialized, but this > > > > at least squashes the compile warning. > > > > > > The compiler needs to be fixed, not the kernel. > > I second this. > I agree on this too. > > Heh, this is coming up again. I'm not convincing you to take the > > change, but just curious what if this is not a compile warning but > > an error for the same cause that compiler is not right. > > Can you elaborate? > Will we have the kernel not compilable for a few cycles until the compiler fixing is available, or we work it around to keep kernel compiling and working before we have the compiler fixed? -- Regards, Shawn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
