On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 09:59:46AM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 22:43:56 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > Apply a naming pattern like in the rest of the subsystem to a first set > > of mux drivers. Those drivers are the low-hanging fruit; we want to pick > > them to motivate upcoming drivers to follow the new pattern. The missing > > GPIO driver will be converted in a later patch. > > Good idea. Thanks. > Acked-by: Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > (I can pick this in my tree if you want, just let me know.) Since I do carry some mux-patches already, might be easier if I keep it. > Now that you made i2c mux non-experimental, I think it would be great > to solve the gpio mux case quickly. Renaming drivers, header files and > public structures is better done early. I'll give it a try. Cool. I intended to ping Peter after my patch, but forgot :/ Will fix the MAINTAINER issue you just mentioned. Wolfram -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
