> > * We should allocate a new functionality flag for it. > > * We should update the documentation to reflect the two use cases. > > That sounds like a good plan. I'll try to get round to it if nobody > beats me to it. Would it make sense to make all four I2C_M_* mangling features seperate I2C_FUNC_* options? The old I2C_FUNC_PROTOCOL_MANGLING could then be all four (seperately) exposed mangling features ORed. That's what I was wondering when looking at the patch. Regards, Wolfram -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
