On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:13:19AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 04/23/2012 05:15 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:49:04PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > >> From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> * Define core portions of the DT binding for I2C bus muxes. > >> * Enhance i2c_add_mux_adapter(): > >> ** Add parameters required for DT support. Update all callers. > >> ** Set the appropriate adap->dev.of_node for the child bus. > >> ** Call of_i2c_register_devices() for the child bus. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > David Daney (CCed) posted another variant [1]. Just looking at the > > patches (and not really using them), I tend to like the approach using > > <reg> better. But I am open for discussion, so I'd appreciate your > > feedback. > > > > Regards, > > > > Wolfram > > > > [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/12/423 > > Ah, that does look like a reasonable binding. May I interpret this as an ack? :) > to be listed last in pinctrl-names (if it's listed at all). I'll update > my patches based on that David's patch. Thanks. -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature