On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 12:16:19 -0400, Douglas Gilbert wrote: > Yes again, the modified i2c-at91.c driver that I am using does not > have support for I2C_M_RECV_LEN. Did you try my patch? > However stepping back from the minor I2C_M_RECV_LEN issue and looking > directly at the i2c-at91 driver itself. My patch to this broken > driver is included below and applies clean against lk 3.2.8 > (but I note that it needs work to apply against lk 3.3). My patch > works for the AT91SAM9G20 and I have positive feedback from > the users of board-foxg20 based on that MCU. I picked this patch from your website already, and forward ported it, my own patch was on top of yours. > However I see that Nikolaus Voss has submitted a replacement driver > for the i2c-at91 that works for the G45 which has two TWI units. > Is that driver going into the mainline? Surely it is much better > than the broken i2c-at91 driver that has been sitting broken for > way too long. Atmel are bringing out new MCUs in that family which > have 3 TWI units (e.g. AT91SAM9G25). Apart from the limitations > about repeated starts surely Atmel have fixed the problems referred > to in existing mainline i2c-at91.c driver from circa 2006. > > My vote would be to add Nikolaus Voss's driver ASAP. I'm not into embedded devices, so this isn't my call. -- Jean Delvare -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
