On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Pavan Savoy <pavan_savoy@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 06:24:50PM +0300, Waldemar.Rymarkiewicz@xxxxxxxxx wrote: >>> Hi Samuel, >>> >>> >That's the Bluetooth approach, and it works just fine as well. >>> >However, the netlink option for sending commands and receiving >>> >answers to/from a subsystem sounds more appropriate, at least to me. >>> >>> I haven't used netlink in practice, so just wondering why netlink. I assume, then, it's more suitable :) >>> >> Have a look at the wireless nl80211.c implementation. It's a good example for >> that sort of usage. > > So, why was the network interface 'ala eth0 or the netlink interface dropped? > I saw these patches recently "NFC: add nfc subsystem core" - which > seem to add just the device /dev/nfc - am I correct ? > Or missing something ? Yes apparently I did miss a whole of patches in the series. So, for anyone who is interested on the list - this is the proposed architecture, http://code.openbossa.org/?p=nfc/linux-nfc.git;a=blob;f=Documentation/networking/nfc.txt;h=e17ac191ca958235db99da23786c46c4c60082e9;hb=f8d3349352063626240ad1c1a15e2361dab81ef4 >> Cheers, >> Samuel. >> >> -- >> Intel Open Source Technology Centre >> http://oss.intel.com/ >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> More majordomo info at Âhttp://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> Please read the FAQ at Âhttp://www.tux.org/lkml/ >> >> >> > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
