On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 06:24:50PM +0300, Waldemar.Rymarkiewicz@xxxxxxxxx wrote: >> Hi Samuel, >> >> >That's the Bluetooth approach, and it works just fine as well. >> >However, the netlink option for sending commands and receiving >> >answers to/from a subsystem sounds more appropriate, at least to me. >> >> I haven't used netlink in practice, so just wondering why netlink. I assume, then, it's more suitable :) >> > Have a look at the wireless nl80211.c implementation. It's a good example for > that sort of usage. So, why was the network interface 'ala eth0 or the netlink interface dropped? I saw these patches recently "NFC: add nfc subsystem core" - which seem to add just the device /dev/nfc - am I correct ? Or missing something ? > Cheers, > Samuel. > > -- > Intel Open Source Technology Centre > http://oss.intel.com/ > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at Âhttp://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at Âhttp://www.tux.org/lkml/ > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
