Hi again, On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Onkalo Samu <samu.p.onkalo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > It would require some more operations since the chip would loose its > state totally. But yes, it could be done. > Yes. Something like re-programming the context. but it would make sure that the module draws no power at all. Also, would it not be correct to include a cancel_work_sync in case of return here? +fail4: + misc_deregister(&chip->miscdev); +fail3: + ak8974_regulators_off(chip); +fail2: + regulator_bulk_free(ARRAY_SIZE(chip->regs), chip->regs); +fail1: + kfree(chip); + return err; +} Cheers! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
