On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 10:59:06 +0900, Magnus Damm wrote: > On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 16:16:37 +0900, Magnus Damm wrote: > >> From: Magnus Damm <damm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> Update the i2c-sh_mobile driver to properly free > >> interrupts. The function sh_mobile_i2c_hook_irqs() > >> is fixed so module both unload and load are working > >> as expected. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm <damm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> > >> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sh_mobile.c | 23 +++++++++++++---------- > >> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > >> > >> --- 0001/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sh_mobile.c > >> +++ work/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sh_mobile.c 2010-08-02 15:14:48.000000000 +0900 > >> @@ -538,15 +538,17 @@ static int sh_mobile_i2c_hook_irqs(struc > >> { > >> struct resource *res; > >> int ret = -ENXIO; > >> - int q, m; > >> - int k = 0; > >> - int n = 0; > >> + int n, k = 0; > > > > You can't really hope to get the code right with such variable names. > > And your suggestion is...? If you see something wrong with the code > please let me know. Nothing specific. I'm just trying to make you realize that one-letter variable names don't carry any meaning and thus make the code harder to write, read and debug. -- Jean Delvare -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html