>>>>> "Michael" == Michael Lawnick <ml.lawnick@xxxxxx> writes: >> But this patch is independent from that work as the mux access isn't >> through I2C, hence no changes to i2c-core needed. Michael> i2c-mux patch does not expect path control via i2c. Michael> Your scenario fits perfectly. Hmm, I'll take a closer look at the last version then - sorry. In the past it afaik did. What is the point of the i2c-core changes if path control isn't via i2c? -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
