>>>>> "Jean" == Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: Jean> The problem is exactly that your patch is independent. It _should_ Jean> build on top of Michael's work, to avoid redundancy. Why? We've discussed this for years, E.G.: http://www.mail-archive.com/i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg01539.html None of the locking changes in core are needed when the MUX isn't controlled through I2C. I guess I could use the i2c-mux.c functions, as there's some overlap in the trivial gpiomux_xfer/gpiomux_func functions, but that can easily be done once the mux stuff is merged. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
