On 04/14/10 15:32, Alan Cox wrote: >> This is in no way a hwmon chip. Surely misc is a better location for now >> (pending the usual discussion about all singing all dancing sensors frameworks). > > Yep it's moving at the moment > > >>> +#include <linux/module.h> >>> +#include <linux/init.h> >>> +#include <linux/slab.h> >>> +#include <linux/i2c.h> >>> +#include <linux/hwmon.h> >> >> Why these extra hwmon includes? At least at first glance I can't see >> any uses of them. The only call to hwmon is to stick this in the >> hwmon class. > > I inherited it for cleanup so these are good points (I've been staring at > piles of these for so long extra input is very useful - this is the tip > of the iceberg !) Cool, post away. Feel free to cc me in on anything in the category of general sensors (accelerometers, magnetometers etc). If nothing else, I'm interested to see them to get ideas for drivers in IIO etc. > >>> +#include <linux/hwmon-sysfs.h> >>> +#include <linux/hwmon-vid.h> >>> +#include <linux/err.h> >>> +#include <linux/delay.h> >> or any mutex usage? >>> +#include <linux/mutex.h> >>> +#include <linux/sysfs.h> >>> + >> >> I guess this makes the driver look like many others, but why bother with >> the wrapping structure? This is only used to keep track of the hwmon >> device to be able to remove it later. > > Should go - agreed will remove > >> These address changes looking a little unusual to me. They may well be needed, but >> if so can we have an explanatory comment? > > Will investigate. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
