> I've seen it, but it is something for the power subsystem maintainer > (or akpm if there is none) to apply. I did kill drivers/i2c/chips for a > reason. Oops, sorry my failure then. I asked Anton Vorontsov (power-maintainer) if he is fine with going this via the i2c-tree, so it will surely come after the needed modification of the core. That is why he "only" acked it. (I still think this sounds reasonable, the other cleaning-up patch should also go via i2c, right? Or am I missing something?) Regards, Wolfram -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
