On Mon, 7 Dec 2009 10:56:24 +0100, Rodolfo Giometti wrote: > On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 10:07:54AM +0100, Michael Lawnick wrote: > > Hi, > > > > on my current project I'm now at the point to have to implement > > multiplexer support. The last patch set from Rodolfo was for 2.6.29, > > most parts seem to have been integrated already in 2.6.31 > > If I got it correctly the patch based on creating a mux folder with > > i2c-mux.c as a core file and then additional mux layer files. > > So my questions: > > Rodolfo, do you have a more resent patch set? > > No. > > > Jean, what are your plans about multiplexer support, where do you see > > open issues? Do you agree with current centralized layout or would you > > prefer independent single files integrating all necessary parts and > > residing in bus folder? > > If Jean agree on my last rework I'm willing to do all whatever is > needed in order to finish this job and integrate this support into the > main line. :) I can't tell if I agree without reading the code, and I won't read the code if the patches do not apply. But don't worry anyway: I do want to add multiplexing support, so even if not in the exact form you're proposing, your work will definitely be the starting point for whatever we end up agreeing on. Which means that your forward porting work will not be time wasted, whatever happens next. Anyway I don't expect the forward porting to need too much work. -- Jean Delvare -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
