On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 18:25:37 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Hello Aleksandar, > > thank you for your very detailed and very good bug-report. I need to do some > tests myself tomorrow, but I think your assumptions are correct. Possibly we > need a similar loop for the read case. I'll add the linux-i2c-list to cc for > more opinions. This makes a lot of sense. When a write operation is in progress, the EEPROM is busy and may not ack its address. Whether the request is another write or a read probably doesn't make a difference, a nack is a nack. So the same waiting loop that we have for writes, is certainly needed for reads as well. Shouldn't be too difficult. Any volunteer? I can review the patch when it's done. -- Jean Delvare -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
