Re: [PATCH] i2c: Bus drivers don't have to support I2C_M_REV_DIR_ADDR

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:22:44PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> I2C bus drivers don't have to support I2C_M_REV_DIR_ADDR. It is a
> deviation from the I2C specification, which only makes sense to
> implement when really needed.

Probably the right thing to do, does anything actually use this
support?
 
> Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-iop3xx.c   |    6 ------
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c  |    3 ---
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-powermac.c |    2 --

I assume that I should merge this in my -next tree?

-- 
Ben (ben@xxxxxxxxx, http://www.fluff.org/)

  'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux