On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 12:07:34PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > On Wed, 7 Oct 2009 11:56:10 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 11:50:17AM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > Hi Grant, > > > > > > Driver ds1682 needs a new home, as drivers/i2c/chips will be gone soon. > > > Do you have a preference for where it should go? > > > > > > As the device includes an EEPROM, the driver could go in > > > drivers/misc/eeprom, but OTOH the EEPROM in question is so small that > > > this can hardly be considered the main feature of the driver. So maybe > > > just drivers/misc? > > > > I would much prefer drivers/misc. > > OK, fine with me. Will you send a patch? Will do if you want one. My idea was to wait for IIO becoming mainline and then take care of both. > For tsl2550, the plan is indeed to wait for iio to become mainline. Or > the alternative ALS subsystem. I hope we won't have to wait too long. Good you mentioned ALS; I forgot about it. I am afraid it will still take a while for IIO, but moving drivers twice is also ugly :( -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature