On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:11:47 +0200, Michael Lawnick wrote: > I took a look into the code of Rodolfo Giometti and it seemed to be in a > way I would have done it, if I wouldn't have been too late. In my > current working I assume this code as a basis. > > Nevertheless my mailed patch has *nothing* to do with multiplexing. > It works on the problem that i2c-mpc has 0 as default class and so there > is no way to instantiate a new-style client that is not mentioned in DTS. If you didn't want to handle warm-plug then that wouldn't be a problem, because you would be able to put all the chip information in the DTS. But you want warm-plug. And warm-plug needs multiplexing support. So your problem is very much related to multiplexing. Now I'll ignore you until I am done with the prerequisites to accept Rodolfo's patches, and with Rodolfo's patches themselves. Discussing your problems when there's nothing I can do about them at the time being, is just a waste of everybody's time. -- Jean Delvare -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
