On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 14:57:26 +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 14:13:32 +0100, Michael Lawnick wrote: > > What is your time line? > > Getting rid of the legacy binding model has higher priority and is far > from being done. I also must take care of Rodolfo's multiplexer > support, which a lot of people have been asking for, and which might as > well be what you really need. The above interface comes next, I can't > give it higher priority as the same can already be achieved today using > module parameters for most drivers. BTW, if you don't want your problem to be overlooked, I strongly suggest that you create yourself a wiki account on http://i2c.wiki.kernel.org/, create a page describing the problem and its proposed solution, and link to it from the "Work in progress" section. -- Jean Delvare -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
