On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 09:32:52 +0100 Daniel Mack <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 09:28:26PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 01:31:55 +0100 Daniel Mack <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > All looks fine to me. > > > > > > > > Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > I cannot find this review which Jonathan performed. Fumbled > > reply-to-all, or did vger break? > > Jonathan replied to the posting on linux-i2c and linux-kernel wasn't in > the loop, sorry. Find his posting here: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-i2c&m=123669064909549&w=2 OK. Please always use reply-to-all, guys. > > I can take care of it. > > > > Was any thought given to the CONFIG_SYSFS=n situation? > > You're right, it should depend on that. You want me so send a patch on > top of the other or one that replaces it? Either way is OK by me at this time. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
