On Sat, 7 Mar 2009 13:06:31 +0100, Daniel Mack wrote: > Hi Jean, > > On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 11:54:49AM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 06:24:32PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > > I agree that it doesn't make sense to wait for the industrial I/O > > > > subsystem to be merged. But I also do not want to put in drivers/hwmon > > > > drivers which do not really belong there. So I'd either go the way you > > > > proposed already (drivers/sensors for non-hwmon sensor drivers) or > > > > simply put your driver in drivers/misc if this is only meant as a > > > > temporary home until the industrial I/O subsystem is merged. > > > > > > Okay, drviers/misc sounds like a good intermediate solution. Do you want > > > me to post another patch for that or will you move it yourself? > > > > Please post new patches, I'll review and apply them. > > Oh, I thought we agreed now to Jonathan Cameron's idea to merge this > driver into the IIO framework and put it mainline sooner or later? No > extra steps needed from my side - this driver certainly doesn't hurry :) Both ways are equally fine with me. -- Jean Delvare -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
