On 6/2/23 05:22, Saurabh Singh Sengar wrote: > Furthermore, I would like to learn about the rationale behind disallowing the > disablement of CONFIG_X86_MPPARSE when MP tables are not in use. Considering > that we compile out the features we don't support, wouldn't it be acceptable to > allow users to customize their configurations in this manner? Allowing the > disablement of CONFIG_X86_MPPARSE would provide greater flexibility and > efficiency for those who do not utilize MP tables. If someone sent a patch, I'd certainly look and figure out what "flexibility" and "efficiency" it would provide. But, honestly, it would just just be noise if it doesn't solve an _actual_ problem. Would anyone care or notice the "flexibility" and "efficiency" it would provide?
