> > Currently the protocol versin is 0.1.1 You may ask why it's called
> > "drv version" rather than "protocol version" -- it's because the PF driver
> > calls it that way, so I think here the VF driver may as well use the same
> > name. BTW, the "drv ver" info is passed to the PF driver in the below
> > function:
>
> Ohh, yes, the "driver version" is not the ideal name for that.
>
> I already looked on it in previous patch, came to the conclusion about
> the protocol and forgot :(.
Which suggests it needs renaming.
Andrew
