On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 11:12:00AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 16:04:31 +0100 Stefano Garzarella wrote:What do you suggest? I did it this way because by modifying only the caller, we would have a nested lock. This way instead we are sure that if we backport this patch, we don't forget to touch hvs_shutdown() as well.I'm not a socket expert but the approach seems reasonable to me.
Thanks, I'll send v2 fixing the warning. Stefano
