On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 16:04:31 +0100 Stefano Garzarella wrote: > What do you suggest? > > I did it this way because by modifying only the caller, we would have a > nested lock. > > This way instead we are sure that if we backport this patch, we don't > forget to touch hvs_shutdown() as well. I'm not a socket expert but the approach seems reasonable to me.
