> On Apr 7, 2020, at 12:38 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 09:28:01AM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: >> Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> writes: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> The x86 Hyper-V hypercall page (hv_hypercall_pg) is the only allocation >>> in the kernel using __vmalloc with exectutable persmissions, and the >>> only user of PAGE_KERNEL_RX. Is there any good reason it needs to >>> be readable? Otherwise we could use vmalloc_exec and kill off >>> PAGE_KERNEL_RX. Note that before 372b1e91343e6 ("drivers: hv: Turn off >>> write permission on the hypercall page") it was even mapped writable.. >> >> [There is nothing secret in the hypercall page, by reading it you can >> figure out if you're running on Intel or AMD (VMCALL/VMMCALL) but it's >> likely not the only possible way :-)] >> >> I see no reason for hv_hypercall_pg to remain readable. I just >> smoke-tested > > Thanks, I have the same in my WIP tree, but just wanted to confirm this > makes sense. Just to make sure we’re all on the same page: x86 doesn’t normally have an execute-only mode. Executable memory in the kernel is readable unless you are using fancy hypervisor-based XO support.