On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 21:37:03 +0000 Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Introduce names for some old pentium models and replace with VFM based > checks. > > Signed-off-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/x86/include/asm/intel-family.h | 3 +++ > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c | 13 ++++++------- > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/intel-family.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/intel-family.h > index 6d7b04ffc5fd..41278093bcd4 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/intel-family.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/intel-family.h > @@ -46,6 +46,9 @@ > #define INTEL_ANY IFM(X86_FAMILY_ANY, X86_MODEL_ANY) > > #define INTEL_PENTIUM_PRO IFM(6, 0x01) > +#define INTEL_PENTIUM_II_KLAMATH IFM(6, 0x03) > +#define INTEL_PENTIUM_III_TUALATIN IFM(6, 0x0B) > +#define INTEL_PENTIUM_M_DOTHAN IFM(6, 0x0D) > > #define INTEL_CORE_YONAH IFM(6, 0x0E) I think I'd add all the extra defines in one patch. Isn't the order 'funny' as well. I think it ends up being neither numeric or date order. Increasing family order is probably best, but the headings for each 'family' probably need to be a bit more descriptive (esp 15 - all P4 netburst). David
