On 10/31/24 03:34, Borislav Petkov wrote: > cpu_feature_enabled() should be used in most cases when CPU feature > support needs to be tested in code. Document that. Yes, please. BTW, I know the code generation isn't great in some cases. But this is the right _way_ to call things no "boot_" or &boot_cpu_data for system-wide things. Underlying code generation can continue to be fixed up over time. Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
