Re: [PATCH 03/16] x86/amd_nb: Clean up early_is_amd_nb()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/16] x86/amd_nb: Clean up early_is_amd_nb()
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 11:24:17 +0100
Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>, Andy Whitcroft <apw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-edac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-edac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "x86@xxxxxxxxxx" <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, "avadhut.naik@xxxxxxx" <avadhut.naik@xxxxxxx>, "john.allen@xxxxxxx" <john.allen@xxxxxxx>, "mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx" <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx>, "bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx" <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Shyam-sundar.S-k@xxxxxxx" <Shyam-sundar.S-k@xxxxxxx>, "richard.gong@xxxxxxx" <richard.gong@xxxxxxx>, "jdelvare@xxxxxxxx" <jdelvare@xxxxxxxx>, "linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "clemens@xxxxxxxxxx" <clemens@xxxxxxxxxx>, "hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx" <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>, "ilpo.jarvinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ilpo.jarvinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-hwmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-hwmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "platform-driver-x86@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <platform-driver-x86@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "naveenkrishna.chatradhi@xxxxxxx" <naveenkrishna.chatradhi@xxxxxxx>, "carlos.bilbao.osdev@xxxxxxxxx" <carlos.bilbao.osdev@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20241030142138.GA1304646@yaz-khff2.amd.com>
References: <20241023172150.659002-1-yazen.ghannam@amd.com> <20241023172150.659002-4-yazen.ghannam@amd.com> <20241025155830.GQZxvAJkJnfLfNpSRx@fat_crate.local> <20241029143928.GA1011322@yaz-khff2.amd.com> <20241029150847.GLZyD6f-Hk6pRTEt2c@fat_crate.local> <SJ1PR11MB6083AA7B2E28F2DA24E4B456FC4B2@SJ1PR11MB6083.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <20241030142138.GA1304646@yaz-khff2.amd.com>

On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 10:21:38AM -0400, Yazen Ghannam wrote:
> And if not to checkpatch, then maybe it can be included in the TIP
> maintainers' handbook? That is, if others are using it or something
> similar.

Nah, this needs to be a normal janitor task. tglx is working on it. :)

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

References:
- [PATCH 00/16] AMD NB and SMN rework
  - From: Yazen Ghannam
- [PATCH 03/16] x86/amd_nb: Clean up early_is_amd_nb()
  - From: Yazen Ghannam
- Re: [PATCH 03/16] x86/amd_nb: Clean up early_is_amd_nb()
  - From: Borislav Petkov
- Re: [PATCH 03/16] x86/amd_nb: Clean up early_is_amd_nb()
  - From: Yazen Ghannam
- Re: [PATCH 03/16] x86/amd_nb: Clean up early_is_amd_nb()
  - From: Borislav Petkov
- RE: [PATCH 03/16] x86/amd_nb: Clean up early_is_amd_nb()
  - From: Luck, Tony
- Re: [PATCH 03/16] x86/amd_nb: Clean up early_is_amd_nb()
  - From: Yazen Ghannam

Prev by Date: RE: [PATCH 06/16] x86/amd_nb: Simplify root device search
Next by Date: [PATCH] x86/cpufeature: Document cpu_feature_enabled() as the default to use
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86/cpufeature: Document cpu_feature_enabled() as the default to use
Next by thread: [PATCH 04/16] x86: Start moving AMD Node functionality out of AMD_NB
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [LM Sensors] [Linux Sound] [ALSA Users] [ALSA Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Linux Media] [Kernel] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [Linux Media]