On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 08:10:38PM +0200, Jerome Brunet wrote:
> pmbus_write_smbalert_mask() ignores the errors if the chip can't set
> smbalert mask the standard way. It is not necessarily a problem for the irq
> support if the chip is otherwise properly setup but it may leave an
> uncleared fault behind.
>
> pmbus_core will pick the fault on the next register_check(). The register
> check will fails regardless of the actual register support by the chip.
>
> This leads to missing attributes or debugfs entries for chips that should
> provide them.
>
> We cannot rely on register_check() as PMBUS_SMBALERT_MASK may be read-only.
>
> Unconditionally clear the page fault after setting PMBUS_SMBALERT_MASK to
> avoid the problem.
>
> Suggested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: 221819ca4c36 ("hwmon: (pmbus/core) Add interrupt support")
> Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c
> index ce697ca03de01c0e5a352f8f6b72671137721868..a0a397d571caa1a6620ef095f9cf63d94e8bda1d 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c
> @@ -3346,7 +3346,12 @@ static int pmbus_regulator_notify(struct pmbus_data *data, int page, int event)
>
> static int pmbus_write_smbalert_mask(struct i2c_client *client, u8 page, u8 reg, u8 val)
> {
> - return _pmbus_write_word_data(client, page, PMBUS_SMBALERT_MASK, reg | (val << 8));
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = _pmbus_write_word_data(client, page, PMBUS_SMBALERT_MASK, reg | (val << 8));
> + pmbus_clear_fault_page(client, -1);
Why -1 and not page ?
Guenter
