On 25/10/2023 16:32, Richard Leitner wrote: >>> are not evaluated by the driver then it's of course fine with me to just >>> add the ina327 compatible in ina2xx.yaml. >> >> Depends. What driver does, might not matter in some cases. What matters >> is if these properties are applicable to this hardware. > > Thanks for that explanation. That makes things clearer to me. > > The properties described in the ina2xx.yaml are applicable to the ina237 > and ina238 hardware, but are not implemented in the ina238.c driver. > > So I will just add the ina237 compatible to the ina2xx.yaml and drop the > ina238.yaml from that series. Would that be fine from your side? Yes, thanks. Best regards, Krzysztof