On 12/4/22 11:13, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Sun, Dec 04, 2022 at 10:37:09AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
I don't immediately see why this should depend on a P8 configuration.
The driver runs on a BMC, after all. My understanding is that a BMC can be
of any architecture. Is there a guarantee that there are and never will be
any x86 BMCs, and/or that BMCs are limited to a certain subset of
architectures ?
Well, then it should depend on the architectures which are currently
running BMCs for P8 machines. ARM maybe?
At least on x86 the majority of BMCs are ARM-based AFAIK.
We are not typically that restrictive in the hwmon subsystem. That isn't done
for many of the other drivers which are typically only used on x86 either.
Why is that suddenly a problem ? Just don't enable it if you don't need it.
Anyway,
commit 58c0399db8bf6bf88c7580b742b0cb45e02f55d5
Author: Jeremy Kerr <jk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
AuthorDate: Mon Oct 24 16:15:27 2022 +0800
Commit: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
CommitDate: Thu Dec 1 09:21:06 2022 -0800
hwmon: (occ) OCC sensors aren't arch-specific
Commit c112d75840fb ("hwmon: OCC drivers are ARM-only") made the OCC
sensor drivers not selectable on powerpc64:
These drivers are for a BMC inside PowerPC servers. The BMC runs on
ARM hardware, so only propose the drivers on this architecture, unless
build-testing.
... but we now have a powerpc64 BMC (still for a powerpc64 host), so
drop the `depends on` that excludes building for this platform.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <jk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Joel Stanley <joel@xxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221024081527.3842565-1-jk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
I really don't want to end up in a situation where I constantly have
to deal with changing architecture support, so I would strongly prefer
to keep it that way unless it is a real problem.
Guenter
