> > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c b/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c index
> > 1c9493c70813..6cdbcfab9f20 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
> > @@ -1707,6 +1707,7 @@ static void lm90_restore_conf(void *_data)
> >
> > static int lm90_init_client(struct i2c_client *client, struct lm90_data *data)
> > {
> > + struct device_node *np = client->dev.of_node;
> > int config, convrate;
> >
> > convrate = lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_CONVRATE); @@
> > -1727,7 +1728,8 @@ static int lm90_init_client(struct i2c_client
> > *client, struct lm90_data *data)
> >
> > /* Check Temperature Range Select */
> > if (data->flags & LM90_HAVE_EXTENDED_TEMP) {
> > - if (config & 0x04)
> > + if (config & 0x04 ||
> > + of_property_read_bool(np,
> > + "onsemi,extended-range-enable"))
> > data->flags |= LM90_FLAG_ADT7461_EXT;
>
> Maybe I am missing something, but I don't see the matching configuration
> change. Specifying the flag in devicetree only really makes sense if the chip
> configuration is changed accordingly.
>
what is confusing here for me is that in the current code we have
"if (config & 0x4)" and if this is true we configure the flags accordingly. But
the bit 0x4 in config is nowhere set in current code. Therefore also the flag is
never set. Or do I miss something?
I am asking because if my assumption is correct I would replace the current
(never matching) check to the new property:
if (of_property_read_bool(np, "ti,extended-range-enable")) {
config |= 0x4;
data->flags |= LM90_FLAG_ADT7461_EXT;
}
Is this ok for you?
Best regards
Holger
