Hi > > > + temperature-sensors { > > > + ltd { > > > + status = "disabled"; > > > + }; > > > + > > > + rtd1 { > > > + status = "okay"; > > > + type = <4> /* thermistor */; > > > > 'type' is a bit generic. We don't want the same property name to > > possibly have multiple definitions. > > > How about sensor-type ? In the datasheet this is called "mode". I called it "type" since it's tempX_type in sysfs and I wanted to stay in sync with that. > > If it is how you address an instance of something which seems to be > > the case here, then 'reg' should be used. > > The reason I didn't do that is because you'd effectively have to duplicate the ID in both the name (e.g. sensor@1) and the reg property (e.g. reg = <1>). But maybe that's just what is is in device tree, I can live with that. However, we'd also have to find out whether the "local" sensor ("LTD") would simply be #4, as it is in sysfs today. I'd also be ok with that as it would keep sysfs and device tree "in sync" wrt. naming. Thanks Oskar.