po 26. 4. 2021 v 16:18 odesílatel Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> napsal: > > On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 02:46:27PM +0200, Václav Kubernát wrote: > > Hello. > > > > I'm sending a new version of my patch on max31790. This new version > > fixes the cache issue and actually makes it work by setting > > .cache_type. You were right about the "yes/no" ranges, so I flipped > > those. > > > > By the way, it seems that the reason your reply got lost is because of > > weird addresses in the "Cc:" email field, they end with "cesnet.cz", > > so it could be that I'm sending email incorrectly. Let me know if I'm > > doing something wrong. > > > > Yes, the To: field of your series is either empty (for the first patch > of the series), or it is something like: > To: unlisted-recipients: no To-header on input <; > > Also, you send your follow-up series as response of the previous series > which doesn't follow the guidance for submitting patches and may result > in the entire series getting lost. > Sorry, I will fix my email-sending procedure. Should I resend the patch series without the In-Reply-To field? Václav > Guenter
