On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 02:46:27PM +0200, Václav Kubernát wrote: > Hello. > > I'm sending a new version of my patch on max31790. This new version > fixes the cache issue and actually makes it work by setting > .cache_type. You were right about the "yes/no" ranges, so I flipped > those. > > By the way, it seems that the reason your reply got lost is because of > weird addresses in the "Cc:" email field, they end with "cesnet.cz", > so it could be that I'm sending email incorrectly. Let me know if I'm > doing something wrong. > Yes, the To: field of your series is either empty (for the first patch of the series), or it is something like: To: unlisted-recipients: no To-header on input <; Also, you send your follow-up series as response of the previous series which doesn't follow the guidance for submitting patches and may result in the entire series getting lost. Guenter
