Re: ABI for these two registers?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Guenter,

On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 11:32:18AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 05:28:14PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > Hello Guenter,
> > 
> > Datasheet: http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/ina3221.pdf
> > (At page 32, chapter 8.6.2.14 and 8.6.2.15)
> > 
> > I have two registers that I need to expose to user space:
> > 	Shunt-Voltage-Sum and Shunt-Voltage-Limit registers
> > 
> > Right now in[123]_input of INA3221 are for voltage channels
> > while in[456]_input are for Shunt voltage channels.
> > 
> > So can I just use in7_input and in7_crit for them?
> > 
> Doesn't Shunt-Voltage-Limit apply to in[456]_input ?
> If so, the limit should be attached to those.

The initial patch of ina3221 driver applied Shunt-Voltage-Limits,
being named as "Critical Alert Limit Registers" in the datasheet,
to curr[123]_crit, corresponding to curr[123] and in[456]_input.

And this Shunt-Voltage-Limit-Sum is more related to the reading
from Shunt-Voltage-Sum, which we just agreed it to be in7_input.

Do you mean that this Limit-Sum should become in[456]_crit even
though it only has one value, related to sum of all three shunt
voltage channels?

> in7_input for Shunt-Voltage-Sum would be fine.

Okay. Will add in7_input for Shunt-Voltage-Sum. Thanks!



[Index of Archives]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux