Em Fri, 12 Apr 2019 09:12:52 -0700 Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > On 4/12/19 9:04 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > > On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 14:07:31 -0700 > > Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >>> While nobody does such split, IMHO, the best would be to keep the > >>> information outside Documentation/admin-guide. But hey! You're > >>> the Doc maintainer. If you prefer to move, I'm perfectly fine > >>> with that. > >>> > >> > >> Same here, but please don't move the files which are kernel facing only. > > > > Well, let's step back and think about this. Who is the audience for > > these documents? That will tell us a lot about where they should really > > be. > > > > Most of them are for users, some of them are for driver developers. A few > are for both, though that is generally not the intention (and one may argue > that driver internal documentation should be moved into the respective > driver source). The big issue is really those files that contain both kernel internals and userspace stuff. This is a common pattern. I just finishing converting a lot more documents to ReST and I found the same thing on almost all document directories I touched. > > What I would prefer to avoid is the status quo where *everything* is in > > the top-level directory, and where documents are organized for the > > convenience of their maintainers rather than of their readers. But > > sometimes I feel like I'm alone in that desire...:) > > > I am fine with separating user pointing from kernel API/driver developer > guides, and I agree that it would make a lot of sense. As I said, please > just make sure that kernel facing files don't end up in the wrong directory. I like the idea of splitting user faced documents from the rest, but this is not an easy task. On several cases, there are just a couple of paragraphs with things like sysfs entries in the middle of a big file with Kernel internals. Thanks, Mauro