On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 16:22:37 -0300 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This series converts the contents of Documentation/hwmon to ReST > format. > > PS.: I opted to group the conversion files per groups of maintainer > set, as, if I were to generate one patch per file, it would give around > 160 patches. > > I also added those patches to my development tree at: > https://git.linuxtv.org/mchehab/experimental.git/log/?h=hwmon > > If you want to see the results, they're at: > https://www.infradead.org/~mchehab/hwmon/ This set seems generally good and could probably be applied as-is. But I have to ask...is there a reason to not take the last step and actually bring this stuff into the Sphinx doc tree? We seem to be mostly documenting sysfs files and such. I am *guessing* that perhaps the set should move to Documentation/admin-guide/hwmon? Or have I misunderstood the intended audience here? Thanks, jon
