Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] hwmon: new driver for ST stts751 thermal sensor

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 02:07:27PM +0200, Andrea Merello wrote:
> This patch adds a HWMON driver for ST Microelectronics STTS751
> temperature sensors.
> 
> It does support temperature reading (of course), SMBUS alert
> functionality and "therm" output.
> 
> Thanks-to: LABBE Corentin [for suggestions]
> Thanks-to: Guenter Roeck [for suggestions/discussions]
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Merello <andrea.merello@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: LABBE Corentin <clabbe.montjoie@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/hwmon/Kconfig   |  12 +-
>  drivers/hwmon/Makefile  |   2 +-
>  drivers/hwmon/stts751.c | 805 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 817 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/hwmon/stts751.c
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig b/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
> index eaf2f91..4e70b42 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
> @@ -1448,6 +1448,16 @@ config SENSORS_SCH5636
>  	  This driver can also be built as a module.  If so, the module
>  	  will be called sch5636.
>  
> +config SENSORS_STTS751
> +	tristate "ST Microelectronics STTS751"
> +	depends on I2C
> +	help
> +	  If you say yes here you get support for STTS751
> +	  temperature sensor chips.
> +
> +	  This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
> +	  will be called stts751.
> +
>  config SENSORS_SMM665
>  	tristate "Summit Microelectronics SMM665"
>  	depends on I2C
> @@ -1506,7 +1516,7 @@ config SENSORS_ADS7871
>  
>  config SENSORS_AMC6821
>  	tristate "Texas Instruments AMC6821"
> -	depends on I2C 
> +	depends on I2C

???

>  	help
>  	  If you say yes here you get support for the Texas Instruments
>  	  AMC6821 hardware monitoring chips.
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/Makefile b/drivers/hwmon/Makefile
> index fe87d28..1114130 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/Makefile
> @@ -147,6 +147,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_SMM665)	+= smm665.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_SMSC47B397)+= smsc47b397.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_SMSC47M1)	+= smsc47m1.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_SMSC47M192)+= smsc47m192.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_STTS751)	+= stts751.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_AMC6821)	+= amc6821.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_TC74)	+= tc74.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_THMC50)	+= thmc50.o
> @@ -169,4 +170,3 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_WM8350)	+= wm8350-hwmon.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PMBUS)		+= pmbus/
>  
>  ccflags-$(CONFIG_HWMON_DEBUG_CHIP) := -DDEBUG
> -

Looks like an unnecessary whitespace change.

> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/stts751.c b/drivers/hwmon/stts751.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..8358e04
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/stts751.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,805 @@
> +/*
> + * STTS751 sensor driver
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2016 Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia - RBCS - EDL
> + * Robotics, Brain and Cognitive Sciences department
> + * Electronic Design Laboratory
> + *
> + * Written by Andrea Merello <andrea.merello@xxxxxxxxx>
> + *
> + * Based on  LM95241 driver and LM90 driver
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
> + * (at your option) any later version.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> + */
> +
> +
No douple empty lines please.

> +#include <linux/bitops.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/hwmon.h>
> +#include <linux/hwmon-sysfs.h>
> +#include <linux/i2c.h>
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/jiffies.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/sysfs.h>
> +#include <linux/util_macros.h>
> +
> +#define DEVNAME "stts751"
> +
> +static const unsigned short normal_i2c[] = {
> +	0x48, 0x49, 0x38, 0x39,  /* STTS751-0 */
> +	0x4A, 0x4B, 0x3A, 0x3B,  /* STTS751-1 */
> +	I2C_CLIENT_END };
> +
> +#define STTS751_REG_TEMP_H	0x00
> +#define STTS751_REG_STATUS	0x01
> +#define STTS751_STATUS_TRIPL	BIT(5)
> +#define STTS751_STATUS_TRIPH	BIT(6)
> +#define STTS751_STATUS_BUSY	BIT(8)
> +#define STTS751_REG_TEMP_L	0x02
> +#define STTS751_REG_CONF	0x03
> +#define STTS751_CONF_RES_MASK	0x0C
> +#define STTS751_CONF_RES_SHIFT  2
> +#define STTS751_CONF_EVENT_DIS  BIT(7)
> +#define STTS751_CONF_STOP	BIT(6)
> +#define STTS751_REG_RATE	0x04
> +#define STTS751_REG_HLIM_H	0x05
> +#define STTS751_REG_HLIM_L	0x06
> +#define STTS751_REG_LLIM_H	0x07
> +#define STTS751_REG_LLIM_L	0x08
> +#define STTS751_REG_ONESHOT	0x0F
> +#define STTS751_REG_TLIM	0x20
> +#define STTS751_REG_HYST	0x21
> +#define STTS751_REG_SMBUS_TO	0x22
> +
> +#define STTS751_REG_PROD_ID	0xFD
> +#define STTS751_REG_MAN_ID	0xFE
> +#define STTS751_REG_REV_ID	0xFF
> +
> +#define STTS751_0_PROD_ID	0x00
> +#define STTS751_1_PROD_ID	0x01
> +#define ST_MAN_ID		0x53
> +
> +/* stick with HW defaults */
> +#define STTS751_THERM_DEFAULT	85000
> +#define STTS751_HYST_DEFAULT	10000
> +#define STTS751_EVENT_MAX_DEFAULT 85000
> +#define STTS751_EVENT_MIN_DEFAULT 0
> +
> +#define STTS751_RACE_RETRY	5
> +#define STTS751_CONV_TIMEOUT	100 /* mS */
> +#define STTS751_CACHE_TIME	100 /* mS */
> +
> +/*
> + * Possible update intervals are (in mS):
> + * 16000, 8000, 4000, 2000, 1000, 500, 250, 125, 62.5, 31.25
> + * However we are not going to complicate things too much and we stick to the
> + * approx value in mS.
> + */
> +static const int stts751_intervals[] = {
> +	16000, 8000, 4000, 2000, 1000, 500, 250, 125, 63, 31
> +};
> +
> +struct stts751_priv {
> +	struct device *dev;
> +	struct i2c_client *client;
> +	struct mutex access_lock;
> +	unsigned long interval;
> +	int res;
> +	bool gen_therm, gen_event;
> +	int event_max, event_min;
> +	int therm;
> +	int hyst;
> +	bool smbus_timeout;
> +	int temp;
> +	unsigned long last_update;
> +	u8 config;
> +	bool min_alert, max_alert;
> +	bool data_valid;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Temperature/interval is always present.
> +	 * Depending by DT therm and event are dynamically added.
> +	 * There are max 4 entries plus the guard
> +	 */
> +	const struct attribute_group *groups[5];
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * These functions converts temperature from HW format to integer format and
> + * vice-vers. They are (mostly) taken from lm90 driver. Unit is in mC.
> + */
> +static int stts751_to_deg(s32 hw_val)
> +{
> +	return hw_val * 125 / 32;
> +}
> +
> +static s16 stts751_to_hw(int val, s32 *hw_val)
> +{
> +	/* HW works in range -64C to +127C */
> +	if ((val > 127000) || (val < -64000))

Extra ( ). However, clamp_val(val, -64000, 127000) is preferred here
instead of returning an error (we don't want to force users to guess
valid ranges).

The upper limit should probably be 127937, though, per datasheet.

> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (val < 0)
> +		*hw_val = (val - 62) / 125 * 32;
> +	else
> +		*hw_val = (val + 62) / 125 * 32;
> +
By having this function return an int, you could combine the 16-bit return
value with the error code, and the extra parameter would not be necessary
(even more so since this function should not return an error in the first
place).

> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int stts751_adjust_resolution(struct stts751_priv *priv)
> +{
> +	u8 res;
> +
> +	switch (priv->interval) {
> +	case 9:
> +		/* 10 bits */
> +		res = 0;
> +		break;
> +	case 8:
> +		/* 11 bits */
> +		res = 1;
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		/* 12 bits */
> +		res = 3;
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (priv->res == res)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	priv->config &= ~STTS751_CONF_RES_MASK;
> +	priv->config |= res << STTS751_CONF_RES_SHIFT;
> +
> +	return i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(priv->client,
> +				STTS751_REG_CONF, priv->config);
> +}
> +
> +static int stts751_update_temp(struct stts751_priv *priv)
> +{
> +	s32 integer1, integer2, frac;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&priv->access_lock);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * There is a trick here, like in the lm90 driver. We have to read two
> +	 * registers to get the sensor temperature, but we have to beware a
> +	 * conversion could occur between the readings. We could use the
> +	 * one-shot conversion register, but we don't want to do this (disables
> +	 * hardware monitoring). So the solution used here is to read the high
> +	 * byte once, then the low byte, then the high byte again. If the new
> +	 * high byte matches the old one, then we have a valid reading. Else we
> +	 * have to read the low byte again, and now we believe we have a correct
> +	 * reading.
> +	 */
> +	integer1 = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(priv->client, STTS751_REG_TEMP_H);
> +	if (integer1 < 0) {
> +		dev_dbg(&priv->client->dev,
> +			"I2C read failed (temp H). ret: %x\n", ret);
> +		ret = integer1;
> +		goto exit;
> +	}
> +
> +	frac = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(priv->client, STTS751_REG_TEMP_L);
> +	if (frac < 0) {
> +		dev_dbg(&priv->client->dev,
> +			"I2C read failed (temp L). ret: %x\n", ret);
> +		ret = frac;
> +		goto exit;
> +	}
> +
> +	integer2 = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(priv->client, STTS751_REG_TEMP_H);
> +	if (integer2 < 0) {
> +		dev_dbg(&priv->client->dev,
> +			"I2C 2nd read failed (temp H). ret: %x\n", ret);
> +		ret = integer2;
> +		goto exit;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (integer1 != integer2) {
> +		frac = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(priv->client,
> +						STTS751_REG_TEMP_L);
> +		if (frac < 0) {
> +			dev_dbg(&priv->client->dev,
> +				"I2C 2nd read failed (temp L). ret: %x\n", ret);
> +			ret = frac;
> +			goto exit;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +exit:
> +	mutex_unlock(&priv->access_lock);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	priv->temp = stts751_to_deg((integer1 << 8) | frac);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int stts751_set_temp_reg(struct stts751_priv *priv, int temp,
> +				bool is_frac, u8 hreg, u8 lreg)
> +{
> +	s32 hwval;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (stts751_to_hw(temp, &hwval))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&priv->access_lock);
> +	ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(priv->client, hreg, hwval >> 8);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto exit;
> +	if (is_frac)
> +		ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(priv->client,
> +						lreg, hwval & 0xff);
> +exit:
> +	mutex_unlock(&priv->access_lock);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int stts751_update_alert(struct stts751_priv *priv)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	/* not for us.. */
> +	if (!priv->gen_event)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	ret = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(priv->client, STTS751_REG_STATUS);
> +
Please no empty line between functions and checking of return values.

> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	priv->max_alert = priv->max_alert || !!(ret & STTS751_STATUS_TRIPH);
> +	priv->min_alert = priv->min_alert || !!(ret & STTS751_STATUS_TRIPL);
> +
I am not really happy about the caching of alert values. This isn't really
common. Usually we report current alert values when reading. I don't really
see why this driver should be different to all the others.

> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void stts751_alert(struct i2c_client *client,
> +			enum i2c_alert_protocol type, unsigned int data)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +	struct stts751_priv *priv = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> +	bool prev_max = priv->max_alert;
> +	bool prev_min = priv->min_alert;
> +
> +	if (type != I2C_PROTOCOL_SMBUS_ALERT)
> +		return;
> +
> +	dev_dbg(&client->dev, "alert!");
> +

Any chance to make this a bit more generic and also support
interrupts ?

> +	mutex_lock(&priv->access_lock);
> +	ret = stts751_update_alert(priv);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		/* default to worst case */
> +		priv->max_alert = true;
> +		priv->min_alert = true;
> +
> +		if (!(prev_max && prev_min)) {
> +			dev_warn(&priv->client->dev,
> +				"Alert received, but can't communicate to the device. Something bad happening? Triggering all alarms!");
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!prev_max && priv->max_alert) {
> +		dev_notice(&client->dev, "got alert for HIGH temperature");
> +
> +		/* unblock alert poll */
> +		sysfs_notify(&priv->dev->kobj, NULL, "temp1_event_max_alert");
> +		kobject_uevent(&priv->dev->kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!prev_min && priv->min_alert) {
> +		dev_notice(&client->dev, "got alert for LOW temperature");
> +
> +		/* unblock alert poll */
> +		sysfs_notify(&priv->dev->kobj, NULL, "temp1_event_min_alert");
> +		kobject_uevent(&priv->dev->kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE);
> +	}
> +	mutex_unlock(&priv->access_lock);
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t show_max_alert(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> +			  char *buf)
> +{
> +	struct stts751_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> +	return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE - 1, "%d\n", priv->max_alert);
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t set_max_alert(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> +		       const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> +	struct stts751_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&priv->access_lock);
> +	priv->max_alert = false;
> +	mutex_unlock(&priv->access_lock);
> +
> +	return count;
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t show_min_alert(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> +			  char *buf)
> +{
> +	struct stts751_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> +	return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE - 1, "%d\n", priv->min_alert);
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t set_min_alert(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> +		       const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> +	struct stts751_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&priv->access_lock);
> +	priv->min_alert = false;
> +	mutex_unlock(&priv->access_lock);
> +
This is highly unusual. If the alert needs to be cleared, please auto-clear it
when reading.

> +	return count;
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t show_input(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> +			  char *buf)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +	int cache_time = STTS751_CACHE_TIME * HZ / 1000;
> +	struct stts751_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Adjust the cache time wrt the sample rate. We do 4X in order to get
> +	 * a new measure in no more than 1/4 of the sample time (that seemed
> +	 * reasonable to me).
> +	 */
> +	cache_time = stts751_intervals[priv->interval] / 4 * HZ / 1000;
> +
> +	if (time_after(jiffies,	priv->last_update + cache_time) ||
> +		!priv->data_valid) {
> +		ret = stts751_update_temp(priv);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +		priv->last_update = jiffies;
> +		priv->data_valid = true;
> +	}
> +
> +	return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE - 1, "%d\n", priv->temp);
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t show_therm(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> +			char *buf)
> +{
> +	struct stts751_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> +	return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE - 1, "%d\n", priv->therm);
> +}
> +
> +
> +static ssize_t set_therm(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> +		       const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +	long temp;
> +	struct stts751_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> +	if (kstrtol(buf, 10, &temp) < 0)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	ret = stts751_set_temp_reg(priv, temp, false, STTS751_REG_TLIM, 0);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
Does it really add value to use the same function for 8- and 16-bit registers ?
Seems to me it just makes the code more complicated.

> +	dev_dbg(dev, "setting therm %ld", temp);
> +
> +	priv->therm = temp;
> +	return count;
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t show_hyst(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> +			char *buf)
> +{
> +	struct stts751_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> +	return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE - 1, "%d\n", priv->hyst);
> +}
> +
> +
> +static ssize_t set_hyst(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> +		       const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +	long temp;
> +	struct stts751_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> +	if (kstrtol(buf, 10, &temp) < 0)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
Per ABI, this is supposed to be an absolute temperature. For the chip,
it is a delta. You'll have to do some calculation to convert the absolute
value into a delta. Same for the show command.

> +	ret = stts751_set_temp_reg(priv, temp, false, STTS751_REG_HYST, 0);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	dev_dbg(dev, "setting hyst %ld", temp);
> +
> +	priv->hyst = temp;
> +	return count;
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t show_max(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> +			char *buf)
> +{
> +	struct stts751_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> +	return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE - 1, "%d\n", priv->event_max);
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t set_max(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> +		       const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +	long temp;
> +	struct stts751_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> +	if (kstrtol(buf, 10, &temp) < 0)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	ret = stts751_set_temp_reg(priv, temp, true,
> +				STTS751_REG_HLIM_H, STTS751_REG_HLIM_L);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	dev_dbg(dev, "setting event max %ld", temp);
> +	priv->event_max = temp;
> +	return count;
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t show_min(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> +			char *buf)
> +{
> +	struct stts751_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> +	return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE - 1, "%d\n", priv->event_min);
> +}
> +
> +

Single empty line, please.

> +static ssize_t set_min(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> +		       const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +	long temp;
> +	struct stts751_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> +	if (kstrtol(buf, 10, &temp) < 0)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	ret = stts751_set_temp_reg(priv, temp, true,
> +				STTS751_REG_LLIM_H, STTS751_REG_LLIM_L);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	dev_dbg(dev, "setting event min %ld", temp);
> +
> +	priv->event_min = temp;
> +	return count;
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t show_interval(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> +			     char *buf)
> +{
> +	struct stts751_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> +	return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE - 1, "%d\n",
> +			stts751_intervals[priv->interval]);
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t set_interval(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> +			    const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> +	unsigned long val;
> +	int idx;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +	struct stts751_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> +	if (kstrtoul(buf, 10, &val) < 0)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	idx = find_closest_descending(val, stts751_intervals,
> +				ARRAY_SIZE(stts751_intervals));
> +
> +	dev_dbg(dev, "setting interval. req:%lu, idx: %d, val: %d", val, idx,
> +		stts751_intervals[idx]);
> +
> +	if (priv->interval == idx)
> +		return count;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&priv->access_lock);
> +
> +	/* speed up, lower the resolution, then modify convrate */
> +	if (priv->interval < idx) {
> +		priv->interval = idx;
> +		ret = stts751_adjust_resolution(priv);
> +		if (ret)
> +			goto exit;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(priv->client, STTS751_REG_RATE, idx);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto exit;
> +
> +	/* slow down, modify convrate, then raise resolution */
> +	if (priv->interval != idx) {
> +		priv->interval = idx;
> +		ret = stts751_adjust_resolution(priv);
> +		if (ret)
> +			goto exit;
> +
Extra empty line. 

Is it really necessary to have this code twice ? What is the harm in
just doing it once, either before or after setting the conversion rate ?

> +	}
> +exit:
> +	mutex_unlock(&priv->access_lock);
> +
> +	return count;
> +}
> +
> +static int stts751_detect(struct i2c_client *new_client,
> +			  struct i2c_board_info *info)
> +{
> +	struct i2c_adapter *adapter = new_client->adapter;
> +	const char *name;
> +	int mfg_id, prod_id, rev_id;
> +
> +	if (!i2c_check_functionality(adapter, I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_BYTE_DATA))
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	mfg_id = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(new_client, ST_MAN_ID);
> +	if (mfg_id != ST_MAN_ID)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	prod_id = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(new_client, STTS751_REG_PROD_ID);
> +
> +	switch (prod_id) {
> +	case STTS751_0_PROD_ID:
> +		name = "STTS751-0";
> +		break;
> +	case STTS751_1_PROD_ID:
> +		name = "STTS751-1";
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +	}
> +	dev_info(&new_client->dev, "Chip %s detected!", name);
> +
Is this noise necessary ?

> +	rev_id = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(new_client, STTS751_REG_REV_ID);
> +
> +	if (rev_id != 0x1) {

You might want to check for an error here (and return -ENODEV if you get one).

> +		dev_notice(&new_client->dev,
> +			"Chip revision 0x%x is untested\nPlease report whether it works to andrea.merello@xxxxxxxxx",
> +			rev_id);
> +	}
> +
> +	strlcpy(info->type, name, I2C_NAME_SIZE);

This doesn't match the driver name (or, rather, the values in
stts751_id). Does this instantiate the driver ? That would surprise
me.

> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int stts751_init_chip(struct stts751_priv *priv)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	priv->config = STTS751_CONF_EVENT_DIS | STTS751_CONF_STOP;
> +	ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(priv->client, STTS751_REG_CONF,
> +					priv->config);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(priv->client, STTS751_REG_RATE,
> +					priv->interval);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	/* invalid, to force update */
> +	priv->res = -1;
> +	ret = stts751_adjust_resolution(priv);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(priv->client,
> +					STTS751_REG_SMBUS_TO,
> +					priv->smbus_timeout ? 0x80 : 0);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +
> +	if (priv->gen_event) {
> +		ret = stts751_set_temp_reg(priv, priv->event_max, true,
> +					STTS751_REG_HLIM_H, STTS751_REG_HLIM_L);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +
> +		ret = stts751_set_temp_reg(priv, priv->event_min, true,
> +					STTS751_REG_LLIM_H, STTS751_REG_LLIM_L);

Those registers all have power-up defaults. Unless there is a good reason,
we should not overwrite them. In some applications, the values may be
initialized from the BIOS/ROMMON.

> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +		priv->config &= ~STTS751_CONF_EVENT_DIS;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (priv->gen_therm) {
> +		ret = stts751_set_temp_reg(priv, priv->therm, false,
> +					STTS751_REG_TLIM, 0);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +
> +		ret = stts751_set_temp_reg(priv, priv->hyst, false,
> +					STTS751_REG_HYST, 0);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	priv->config &= ~STTS751_CONF_STOP;
> +	ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(priv->client,
> +					STTS751_REG_CONF, priv->config);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp1_input, S_IRUGO, show_input, NULL, 0);
> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp1_event_min, S_IWUSR | S_IRUGO,
> +			show_min, set_min, 0);
> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp1_event_max, S_IWUSR | S_IRUGO,
> +			show_max, set_max, 0);
> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp1_event_min_alert, S_IWUSR | S_IRUGO,
> +			show_min_alert, set_min_alert, 0);
> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp1_event_max_alert, S_IWUSR | S_IRUGO,
> +			show_max_alert, set_max_alert, 0);
> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp1_therm, S_IWUSR | S_IRUGO, show_therm,
> +			set_therm, 0);
> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp1_therm_hyst, S_IWUSR | S_IRUGO, show_hyst,
> +			set_hyst, 0);

Please use standard attribute names.

> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(update_interval, S_IWUSR | S_IRUGO,
> +			show_interval, set_interval, 0);
> +
> +/* always present */
> +static struct attribute *stts751_temp_attrs[] = {
> +	&sensor_dev_attr_temp1_input.dev_attr.attr,
> +	NULL
> +};
> +
> +static struct attribute_group stts751_temp_group = {
> +	.attrs = stts751_temp_attrs,
> +};
> +
> +/* present when therm pin or event pin are connected */
> +static struct attribute *stts751_interval_attrs[] = {
> +	&sensor_dev_attr_update_interval.dev_attr.attr,
> +	NULL
> +};
> +
> +static struct attribute_group stts751_interval_group = {
> +	.attrs = stts751_interval_attrs,
> +};
> +
> +/* present when event pin is connected */
> +static struct attribute *stts751_event_attrs[] = {
> +	&sensor_dev_attr_temp1_event_min.dev_attr.attr,
> +	&sensor_dev_attr_temp1_event_max.dev_attr.attr,
> +	&sensor_dev_attr_temp1_event_min_alert.dev_attr.attr,
> +	&sensor_dev_attr_temp1_event_max_alert.dev_attr.attr,
> +	NULL
> +};
> +
> +static struct attribute_group stts751_event_group = {
> +	.attrs = stts751_event_attrs,
> +};
> +
> +/* present when therm pin is connected */
> +static struct attribute *stts751_therm_attrs[] = {
> +	&sensor_dev_attr_temp1_therm.dev_attr.attr,
> +	&sensor_dev_attr_temp1_therm_hyst.dev_attr.attr,
> +	NULL
> +};
> +
> +static struct attribute_group stts751_therm_group = {
> +	.attrs = stts751_therm_attrs,
> +};
> +
> +static int stts751_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> +			 const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> +{
> +	struct stts751_priv *priv;
> +	int ret;
> +	int groups_idx = 0;
> +	struct device_node *np = client->dev.of_node;
> +
> +	priv = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!priv)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	priv->client = client;
> +	i2c_set_clientdata(client, priv);
> +	mutex_init(&priv->access_lock);
> +
> +	/* default to 2 samples per second */
> +	priv->interval = 5;
> +	/* default to timeout enable, as per chip default */
> +	priv->smbus_timeout = true;
> +	priv->last_update = 0;
> +	priv->data_valid = false;
> +	priv->max_alert = false;
> +	priv->min_alert = false;
> +	priv->gen_therm = false;
> +	priv->gen_event = false;

Unnecessary initializations.

> +	priv->therm = STTS751_THERM_DEFAULT;
> +	priv->hyst = STTS751_HYST_DEFAULT;
> +	priv->event_max = STTS751_EVENT_MAX_DEFAULT;
> +	priv->event_min = STTS751_EVENT_MIN_DEFAULT;
> +
I think it would be better to read the initial values from the chip
(also see above).

> +	if (np) {
> +		priv->gen_therm = of_property_read_bool(np, "has-therm");
> +		priv->gen_event = of_property_read_bool(np, "has-event");
> +		priv->smbus_timeout = !of_property_read_bool(np,
> +						"smbus-timeout-disable");
> +	} else {
> +		dev_notice(&client->dev, "No DT data. Event/therm disabled\n");

Seems to be quite rude to penaltize non-DT systems this way.

> +	}
> +
> +	dev_dbg(&client->dev, "gen_event: %s, gen_therm: %s",
> +		priv->gen_event ? "YES" : "NO",
> +		priv->gen_therm ? "YES" : "NO");
> +
> +	priv->groups[groups_idx++] = &stts751_temp_group;
> +	priv->groups[groups_idx++] = &stts751_interval_group;

Any reason for having multiple groups here ?

> +
> +	if (priv->gen_therm)
> +		priv->groups[groups_idx++] = &stts751_therm_group;
> +
> +	if (priv->gen_event)
> +		priv->groups[groups_idx++] = &stts751_event_group;
> +
Why are those groups optional ? This is quite unusual. Even if the chip is not
connected to alert or interrupt lines, it still supports limit registers and
reports alerts. On top of that, at least interrupt support can be detected
automatically (from client->irq) and would not need a devicetree property.

I think you really only need a single group, and all attributes should always
be available.

> +	priv->groups[groups_idx] = NULL;

Unnecessary initialization. devm_kzalloc() initializes priv with 0.

> +
> +	ret = stts751_init_chip(priv);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	priv->dev = devm_hwmon_device_register_with_groups(&client->dev,
> +							client->name, priv,
> +							priv->groups);
> +	return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(priv->dev);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct i2c_device_id stts751_id[] = {
> +	{ "stts751", 0 },
> +	{ }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, stts751_id);
> +
> +static struct i2c_driver stts751_driver = {
> +	.class		= I2C_CLASS_HWMON,
> +	.driver = {
> +		.name	= DEVNAME,
> +	},
> +	.probe		= stts751_probe,
> +	.id_table	= stts751_id,
> +	.detect		= stts751_detect,
> +	.alert		= stts751_alert,
> +	.address_list	= normal_i2c,
> +};
> +
> +module_i2c_driver(stts751_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Andrea Merello <andrea.merello@xxxxxxxxx>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("STTS751 sensor driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hwmon" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hwmon" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux