On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 11:21:45PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > One error check is moved and one is dropped. > No functional changes intended. > > Andy Shevchenko (2): > gpiolib: acpi: Remove never true check in acpi_get_gpiod_by_index() > gpiolib: acpi: Check for errors first in acpi_find_gpio() Both, Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] gpiolib: acpi: A couple of error checks amendmends
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] gpiolib: acpi: A couple of error checks amendmends
- From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 16:28:06 +0300
- In-reply-to: <20240410202243.1658129-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- References: <20240410202243.1658129-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] gpiolib: acpi: A couple of error checks amendmends
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] gpiolib: acpi: A couple of error checks amendmends
- References:
- [PATCH v1 0/2] gpiolib: acpi: A couple of error checks amendmends
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- [PATCH v1 0/2] gpiolib: acpi: A couple of error checks amendmends
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v6 08/11] misc: tps6594-pfsm: Add TI TPS65224 PMIC PFSM
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] spi: Switch to using is_acpi_device_node() in spi_dev_set_name()
- Previous by thread: [PATCH v1 2/2] gpiolib: acpi: Check for errors first in acpi_find_gpio()
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] gpiolib: acpi: A couple of error checks amendmends
- Index(es):
 |